Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

287 F.2d 410

Docket No. 14186.

Bell v. Gray

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-12-19

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bell v. Gray

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1960-12-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1992

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

701960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Sol Goodman, Cincinnati, Ohio, Goodman & Goodman, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief, for appellants.

Louise Foster, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Meyer Rothwacks, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. and Jean L. Auxier, U. S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., on brief, for appellees.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

¶1

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

¶2

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court, 191 F.Supp. 328, be affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Swinford.

/287/f2d/410 · .json · Public domain