Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Hines v. Davidowitz · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University · Honig v. Doe · Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. · Thomas v. Cincinnati Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Though Nicholas looks to our Sister Circuits for support, the cases he cites, given the procedural posture of this case, are inapplicable. Although the cases on which he relies contain strong ‘automatic injunction' language, each deals with a district court’s original grant or denial of a 'stay put' order or 'stay put’ injunction. No case cited deals with appellate review of a district court's refusal to enjoin a preexisting 'stay put' order. See Zvi D. v. Ambach, 694 F.2d 904, 906 (2d Cir.1982) (stating that [§ 1415(j) ] 'substitutes an absolute rule in favor of the status quo for the court's discretionary consideration of the factors of irreparable harm and either a likelihood of success on the merits or a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships'); see also Drinker v. Colonial Sch. Dist., 78 F.3d 859, 864 (3d Cir.1996) (quoting Zvi D. and adopting the reasoning of the Second Circuit); Bd. of Educ. of Cmty. High Sch. Dist. No. 218, Cook County v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 103 F.3d 545, 550 (7th Cir.1996) (holding that use of the preliminary injunction equitable factors would ‘dilute the statutory framework’ under the ‘stay put' provision).” Johnson, 287 F.3d at 1180.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“strip schools of the `unilateral authority they had traditionally employed to exclude disabled students ... from school' and to protect children from any retaliatory action by the agency.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“typically the placement described in the child's most recently implemented IEP,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.