United States v. Warnick’s Empirical Analysis
287 F.3d 299 · 2002
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
May 2021
most recently cited
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Mistretta v. United States · Stinson v. United States · United States v. Daughtrey · United States v. LaBonte · Godoy v. Office of Personnel Management
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plain language of § 2Dl.l(b)(6) ... merely requires that a defendant meet the criteria found in § 5C1.2(l)-(5); it does not limit the defendant’s eligibility for the two-level downward reduction based upon the offense of conviction or otherwise state that the defendant must satisfy any of the other requirements found -in § 5C1.2.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.