Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 F.3d 801 - United States v. Working

United States v. Working’s Empirical Analysis

287 F.3d 801 · 2002

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
July 2022
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably United States v. Waknine (2008), Living Designs Inc v. Ei Dupont De Nemours and Company (2005)

28 federal appellate · 1 district ·

380200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2106

Relies on Koon v. United States · United States v. Ferra · United States v. Sablan · United States v. Working · Smith v. Mulvaney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the original judge would reasonably be expected upon remand to have substantial difficulty in putting out of his or her mind previously-expressed views or findings determined to be erroneous or based on evidence that must be rejected, (2) whether reassignment is advisable to preserve the appearance of justice, and (3) whether reassignment would entail waste and duplication out of proportion to any gain in preserving the appearance of fairness. The first two factors are of equal importance, and a finding of either one would support remand to a different judge.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Every departure must be `reasonable' in extent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the sentencing guidelines,. policy statements and official commentary of the Sentencing Commission,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.