Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 F.3d 827 - Bechard v. Rappold

Bechard v. Rappold’s Empirical Analysis

287 F.3d 827 · 2002

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Tenney v. Brandhove · Bogan v. Scott-Harris · San Pedro Hotel Co. v. City of Los Angeles · Schultz v. Sundberg · Leisek v. Brightwood Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the act applies to a few individuals, or to the public at large”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the act involves ad hoc decisionmaking, or the formulation of policy”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether it bears all the hallmarks of traditional legislation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.