Stamler v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 2 U.S.C. § 118 · 2 U.S.C. § 192 · 2 U.S.C. § 194 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283
Relies on Flast v. Cohen · Dombrowski v. Pfister · Tenney v. Brandhove · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Zemel v. Rusk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“being ancillary to the claims against the Congressional defendants,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stamler v. Willis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.