Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 FSUPP 894 - Howard v. Allen

Howard v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
February 1973
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 1365 · 7 U.S.C. § 1366 · 7 U.S.C. § 1375 · 7 U.S.C. § 1378

Relies on Crolley v. Tatton · Uphaus v. Wyman · Luke v. Review Committee · 232 F. Supp. 479 - Williamson v. Holland · 179 F. Supp. 682 - Dighton v. Coffman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(d) Required reconstitutions. A reconstitution of a farm either by division or by combination shall be required whenever: (1) A change has occurred in the operation of the land after the last constitution or reconstitution and as a result of such change the farm does not meet the conditions for constitution of a farm as set forth in paragraph (b) of this section * * * ■» * * (5) The county committee determines that the tracts of land included in a farm are not being operated as a single farming unit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Phillips v. Simpson
  2. ““A reviewing court should not substitute its views on the construction and application of the regulations for those of the agency charged with administering the program unless the interpretation and application of the regulations in and to a particular case is so unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious that the court must conclude that the administrative action was unlawful.” Howard v. Allen, E.D.N.C., 287 F.Supp. 894, 898 (1968).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Phillips v. Simpson
  3. ““The review by the court shall be limited to questions of law, and the findings of fact by the review committee, if supported by evidence, shall be conclusive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Phillips v. Simpson

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.