Starr v. Georgeson Shareholder, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 2005
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Hillson Partners Limited Partnership v. Adage, Incorporated · Glazer v. Formica Corp. · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,420 · Sailors v. Northern States Power Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the availability of the alternative means was already part of the `mix' of information readily available (in fact, mailed directly) to the AirTouch stockholders, who had been informed of the cost-free exchanges available through EquiServe, in Vodafone's two earlier mailings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“PMC Notices gave the impression that Georgeson was the only means by which shareholders could exchange their shares, by implying that the shareholders were too late to participate in the normal share exchange previously offered by EquiServe....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“), in which he alleged that Georgeson and Vodafone violated § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, in their handling of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.