← 287 FSUPP3D 471 - Perozzi v. Berryhill

Perozzi v. Berryhill’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

cited by 3 later decisions

October 2018

most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Sullivan v. Zebley · Rosa v. Callahan · Schaal v. Apfel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“An ALJ has discretion to resolve conflicts in the record, including with reference to a claimant's reported activities of daily living....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Coger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. · London v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“[The consulting physician's] use of the word 'moderate' is vague and provides no support for the ALJ's conclusion that plaintiff engage in these activities for six hours out of an eight hour day.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Richardson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“the Second Circuit has held that when compiling an RFC from the record, an ALJ may not rely on opinions that employ the term 'moderate' ... absent additional information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Richardson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.