Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 Ga. 338 - Manley v. State

Manley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Owens · Malcolm v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A suspect who asks for a lawyer at any time during a custodial interrogation may not be subjected to further questioning by law enforcement until an attorney has been made available or until the suspect reinitiates the conversation. If the police persist in questioning a suspect who has requested that counsel be present, any resulting statements made by the suspect are inadmissible in the State’s case-in- chief. In order for a suspect to properly invoke his right to counsel during a custodial interrogation, he must articulate his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly that a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.” [Cit.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`the witness would need to understand the parole disparity and its connection to the district attorney's charging decisions for the issue to be open to cross-examination, as witnesses cannot be influenced by matters about which they are unaware.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`decisions made by the district attorney in exchange for the witness's cooperation and testimony for the State,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.