287 Ill. App. 3d 458 - Webber v. Bednarczyk’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

20 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Supreme Court Rule 91(b) does not provide for sanctions for what the parties do or do not do prior to an arbitration hearing. The rule only concerns itself with what occurs during a hearing. The rule attempts to ensure that all parties participate in a meaningful manner in an arbitration hearing. The rule does not attempt to do anything more.” Webber, 287 Ill. App. 3d at 463 .”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 307 Ill. App. 3d 48 - Easter Seal Rehabilitation Center for Will-Grundy Counties, Inc. v. Current Development Corp. · 337 Ill. App. 3d 369 - Amro v. Bellamy

2. “the arbitration panel members are in the best position to judge the participation of the parties before them,” and”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 292 Ill. App. 3d 669 - West Bend Mutual Insurance v. Herrera

3. “debarred from Rejecting the arbitration award”;”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 292 Ill. App. 3d 669 - West Bend Mutual Insurance v. Herrera