Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 Md. 342 - Queen v. Agger

Queen v. Agger’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
3
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

2 district · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Newell v. Richards (1991), Queen v. Queen (1987)

2 district · 64 state decisions

26019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dempsey v. State · Walston v. Sun Cab Co. · Solvuca v. Ryan & Reilly Co. · Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc. v. Damasiewicz · Liggett & Meyers Tobacco Co. v. Goslin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““designed to protect workers and their families from hardships inflicted by work-related injuries. More particularly, it is designed to provide workers with compensation for loss of earning capacity resulting from accidental injury, disease or death arising out of and in the course of employment, to provide vocational rehabilitation, and to provide adequate medical services.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The oral contract between the health care provider and the claimant resulted in charges for services provided uner § 37 which were in excess of the amount approved by the Commission. Such a contract violates the statute and will not be enforced. We shall reverse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “No person shall charge or collect any compensation ... for services or treatment rendered or supplies furnished pursuant to § 37 of this article, unless the same be approved by the Commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.