Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 N.J. Super. 416 - State v. Tango

287 N.J. Super. 416 - State v. Tango’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)

Relies on State v. Roth · United States v. Chavez · United States v. Chavez · State v. Ghertler · State v. Sainz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “authorization order specified the required information to the extent practicable in the circumstances, which is all that is required”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.