Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 NW2D 596 - Blink v. McNabb

Blink v. McNabb’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2025

7 state decisions

4019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Epperson · Holden v. Construction MacHinery Company · Vermeer Ex Rel. Vermeer v. Sneller · Hawkeye Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co. · Oak Leaf Country Club, Inc. v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In considering the sufficiency of the content of the notice [of appeal,] ... if the intent of the appellant to appeal from a judgment may be inferred from the text of the notice and if the appellee has not been misled by the defect the appeal will be entertained. This more liberal rule of construction is consistent with our oft repeated preference for disposition of cases on the merits and not on mere technicalities.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.