State v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “" ' Poston demonstrates that evidence presented at trial on erroneously joined charges would be "admissible," as we used that term in Poston , in a hypothetical trial on each charge or properly joined group of charges, only when (1) each item of evidence that was actually presented could have been admitted in the hypothetical trial under a legally correct evidentiary analysis and (2) it is implausible that, had the defendant objected under OEC 403 or raised some other objection invoking the trial court's discretion, the trial court would have excluded that evidence in the hypothetical trial.' "”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Warren

2. “the facts alleged in the indictment for the charges of unlawfully obtaining public benefits, and the charge of unsworn falsification * * * establish that they are of 'the same or similar character.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Warren

3. “[b]ased on two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Warren