State v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When [the officer's] words do not provide the listener with a reasonable opportunity to choose to consent, or when those words leave the listener with the impression that a search is inevitable, absent strong countervailing factors, we have consistently found acquiescence rather than consent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The test for voluntariness is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, the consent was given by an act of a [person's] free will, as opposed to resulting from express or implied coercion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A defendant's 'mere acquiescence' to police authority does not constitute voluntary consent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.