287 Or. App. 424 - Johnson v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a performance element: that trial counsel failed to exercise reasonable professional skill and judgment; and (2) a prejudice element: that petitioner suffered prejudice as a result of counsel's inadequacy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“assert that our analysis of counsel's performance differs under the applicable state and federal constitutional provisions * * * we frame our discussion in terms of the Oregon constitutional standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A petitioner is entitled to post-conviction relief when there has been a 'substantial denial' of a federal or state constitutional right, 'which rendered the conviction void.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.