Lopez v. Nooth’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a post-conviction petitioner informs the court of an attorney's failure to raise issues so as to avoid the preclusive effect of ORS 138.550(3) [,]”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 289 Or. App. 843 - Crossley v. Myrick · 291 Or. App. 164 - Hieu Doan Truong v. Premo

2. “" Church did not require the post-conviction court to respond to petitioner's pro se claims by making the discretionary determination advocated by petitioner or to consider those claims on their merits. Rather, Church means simply that, to the extent the post-conviction court refused to consider those claims because they were not asserted through counsel, ORS 138.550(3) will not bar petitioner from pursuing them in a subsequent petition because he has followed Church 's directive by bringing those claims to the attention of the post-conviction court below in this proceeding."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 289 Or. App. 843 - Crossley v. Myrick · 290 Or. App. 710 - Worden v. Premo

3. “flows from a mistaken legal premise, its decision * * * may be legally impermissible because it was guided by the wrong substantive standard.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 291 Or. App. 164 - Hieu Doan Truong v. Premo