Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 Pa. 547 - Commonwealth v. Doris

Commonwealth v. Doris’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
13
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently March 2003 · most notably Commonwealth v. Farquharson (1976), Commonwealth v. Redline (1958)

84 state decisions — followed in 13 states

260192619301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ruloff v. . the People · Commonwealth v. Micuso · People v. . Nichols · People v. Pool · Commonwealth v. Lawrence

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Doris' arrest prior to the murder] overlooks the fact that he joined in the common design, and is responsible for the acts of each naturally to be expected to occur in carrying it out. It is true that he could have abandoned the enterprise, and given sufficient time to the others to do likewise, and thus have relieved himself from liability for subsequent acts of his fellows. But he cannot escape responsibility for an act which is the probable consequence of the criminal scheme which he has helped to devise and carry forward.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.