Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 Pa. Super. 314 - Commonwealth v. Sharp

287 Pa. Super. 314 - Commonwealth v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
February 1989
most recently cited

41 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Ehredt · 270 Pa. Super. 178 - Commonwealth v. Miller · 264 Pa. Super. 178 - Commonwealth v. Sinor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) At any time prior to the expiration of the period for commencement of trial, the attorney for the Commonwealth may apply to the court for an order extending the time for commencement of trial. A copy of such application shall be served upon the defendant through his attorney, if any, and the defendant shall also have the right to be heard thereon. Such application shall be granted only if trial cannot be commenced within the prescribed period despite due diligence by the Commonwealth. Any order granting such application shall specify the date or period within which trial shall be commenced.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When witnesses become unavailable toward the end of the Rule 1100 time period—whether through vacation, illness, or other reasons not within the Commonwealth’s control—the Commonwealth is prevented from commencing trial within the requisite period despite its due diligence and an extension of time is warranted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.