Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

287 S.C. 171

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 5, 1985

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1985-08-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1998

1 state decisions

Applies SC 17 § 17-23-110

Relies on State v. Blackburn · Simmons v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-08-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Appellant seeks a remand to the circuit court for the purpose of moving for a new trial. The motion is denied.

¶3Appellant was tried and convicted of murder. His appeal is currently pending. Following his conviction and sentence, appellant entered into a post-conviction plea agreement whereby the solicitor’s office agreed not to oppose appellant’s motion for a new trial if appellant testified against his co-defendant. The solicitor agreed to allow appellant to plead to a lesser offense upon the grant of the motion. Appellant complied with the agreement and filed this motion.

¶4The solicitor has broad discretion in choosing the offenses with which a defendant will be charged and in plea negotiations leading up to trial. See State v. Blackburn, 271 S. C. 324, 247 S. E. (2d) 334 (1978); Simmons v. State, 264 S. C. 417, 215 S. E. (2d) 883 (1975). However, the solicitor has no authority to enter into plea negotiations with regard to a charge for which a defendant has already been sentenced. The decision to grant a new trial is for the trial judge. S. C. Code Ann. § 17-23-110 (1976).

¶5The post conviction plea agreement appellant relies upon in his motion is invalid. The motion is denied.

¶6This order shall be published with the opinions of the Court.

Harwell, J., not participating.
/287/sc/171 · .json · Public domain