Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

287 S.C. 194

In re Iseman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 29, 1985

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1985-10-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2003

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-10-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Harwell, Justice,

¶1dissenting:

¶2I disagree as to the appropriate sanction in this case and would impose a private reprimand. While respondent did violate DR9-102, the violations did not result from an intent to misappropriate funds nor to deceive any client. No checks were returned for insufficient funds, no client lost money, and the respondent did not receive financial benefit from the violation. Under these circumstances, I believe that a private reprimand is the appropriate sanction.

/287/sc/194 · .json · Public domain