287 So. 2d 415 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"If read literally, this subsection would appear to have no application even to those situations where an order dismissing an information has been overturned on appeal, because there has never been a `trial.' On the other hand, there is no specific provision in the Rule for a first trial after reversal of an order dismissing an information. Therefore, it would be logical to assume that the Supreme Court intended for the 90 day period specified in CrPR 3.191(g) to apply to a trial under those circumstances." (footnote omitted)”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Tucker v. State · 344 So. 2d 284 - Tucker v. State

2. “"The periods of time established by this Rule for trial may at any time be waived or extended by order of the court ... (iv) [for] a period of reasonable and necessary delay resulting from proceedings including but not limited to ... interlocutory appeals... ."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Tucker v. State · 336 So. 2d 3 - State v. Wise

3. “"A person who is to be tried again shall be brought to trial within 90 days from the date of ... receipt by the trial court of a mandate ... from an appellate or other reviewing court which makes possible a new trial for the defendant... ."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Tucker v. State · 344 So. 2d 311 - State v. Williams