Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

287 So. 2d 739

Neil v. Ellis

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1973-06-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1974

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1973-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

BOARDMAN, Judge.

¶2This matter is before the court on separate motions to dismiss of appellees, Carien Realty Company and A. L. Ellis and Helen L. Ellis.

¶3The pertinent part of the trial court’s order is:

Amended Counterclaim of Marjorie R. Neil be and the same is hereby granted without leave to Defendant, Neil to amend.
2. Defendant, Carien Realty Company’s Motion to Dismiss Crossclaim of Marjorie R. Neil be and the same is hereby granted without leave to Defendant, Neil to amend.

¶4The sole question for our determination is whether the order entered by the able trial judge is a final order susceptible to appeal.

¶5The record before the court is insufficient to support the motions to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, they are

¶6Denied.

*740HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
/287/so2d/739 · .json · Public domain