Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 SW 155 - Hable v. Owens

Hable v. Owens’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1971
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1971

3 state decisions

10192619301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spann v. Cochran & Ewing · White, Smith & Baldwin v. Downs · Houston v. Dickson · Taylor v. Boyd · McDonough v. Cross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rulé in this state is that a vendor’s lien arises by implication where a part of the consideration for a deed is a note or an obligation to pay money in the future. Where a vendee agrees as part of thé consideration for his deed to discharge a debt due by his vendor, such a transaction creates an equitable vendor’s lien in favor of the vendor on the premises conveyed, as well as a personal obligation against the vendee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.