Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

287 S.W. 244

Craycroft v. Crawford

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1926

Texas Commission of Appeals · decided 1926-10-27

Relies on Craycroft v. Crawford

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-10-27

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1970

6 state decisions

20192619301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NICKELS, J.

¶1We have carefully considered all matters presented in the motion for rehearing filed by defendants in error in the cause, and, in our opinion, nothing is presented which discloses any material error.

¶2In subdivision 6, p. 10, of our original opinion (285 S. W. 280), this statement is made:1

“It [i. e. the will] had no attestation and (in the probate) it was not proved otherwise than by identification of the handwriting.”

¶3We have determined that the reference to what was proved “in the probate” is without support in the record, and we desire to modify the opinion to the extent of omitting that reference. This error, however, seems to us to he immaterial.

¶4We recommend that the motion for rehearing be overruled.

/287/sw/244 · .json · Public domain