Bartholomew v. Paniello’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2016
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Seigel · 13 Cal. 2d 130 - Braun v. Brown · Stewart v. Duncan · Phœnix Dress Co. Fichaux v. Heller · Commanding Officer United States Army Base, Camp Breckinridge v. United States ex rel. Bumanis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Conceding, without deciding, that appellant was an aggrieved ‘person’ under KRS 243.560(2) and could have appealed to the Franklin Circuit Court and conceding, without deciding, that appellant could have intervened and been made a party in the Franklin Circuit Court, he failed to take either of these steps. The term ‘party’ as used in KRS 243.590 and CR 73.02 clearly means a party of record in the proceedings.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kelly v. Marino
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.