Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 SW3D 158 - Haddock v. Quinn

Haddock v. Quinn’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2023

17 state decisions

160200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. · Walker v. Packer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a general reference in the arbitration agreement to the AAA rules, without more, does not clearly and unmistakably manifest [the] parties’ intent to refer the issue of waiver by litigation conduct to the arbitrator”); Burlington Res. Oil & Gas Co. v. San Juan Basin Royalty Tr., 249 S.W.3d 34, 40 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (reasoning that even”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the majority view does not 'mandate that arbitrators decide arbitrability in all cases where an arbitration clause incorporates the AAA rules' "); see also Burlington Res. Oil & Gas Co. LP v. San Juan Basin Royalty Tr. , 249 S.W.3d 34 , 41 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (concluding that the agreement's "mere reference”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether the parties have submitted a particular dispute to arbitration, i.e., the question of arbitrability, is an issue for judicial determination unless the parties clearly and unmistakably provide otherwise,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.