Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 U.S. 124 - Grau v. United States

Grau v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

287 U.S. 124 · 1932

Citation profile

242
cited by 242 later decisions
48
cited 48 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

88 federal appellate · 8 district · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 242 later decisions (48 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2006 · most notably Brinegar v. United States (1949), Spinelli v. United States (1969)

88 federal appellate · 8 district · 57 state decisions — followed in 15 states

87019321940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Boyd v. United States · Gouled v. United States · Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States · Steele v. United States No. 1 · Byars v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 242 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A search warrant may issue only upon evidence which would be competent in the trial of the offense before a jury (Giles v. United States, 1 Cir., 284 F. 208 ; Wagner v. United States, 8 Cir., 8 F.2d 581 ); and would lead a man of prudence and caution to believe that the offense has been committed. (Steele v. United States, 267 U.S. 498 , 504, 45 S.Ct. 414 , 69 L.Ed. 757 .)”*”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “liberally construed to prevent impairment of the protection extended.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.