Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 U.S. 129 - United States Stapf v. Coris

United States Stapf v. Coris’s Empirical Analysis

287 U.S. 129 · 1932

Citation profile

135
cited by 135 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 1970
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 135 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1970 · most notably Rosenberg v. Fleuti (1963), Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding (1953)

56 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions

53019321940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States ex rel. Stapf v. Corsi (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United States Claussen v. · Philippides v. Day · Weedin v. Okada · United States ex rel. Georgas v. Day

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question is whether by so doing he made a new entry into the United States which left him amenable to the provisions of the act of 1924. * * * The relator’s arrival in the United States in April, 1929, was an entry into this country notwithstanding he was a member of the crew of an American ship which had made a round trip voyage. He came from a place outside the United States, and from a foreign port or place, within the meaning of the immigration laws. United States ex rel. Claussen v. Day, 279 U.S. 398 , 49 S.Ct. 354 , 73 L.Ed. 758 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “excluded from admission into the United States,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.