Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 287 U.S. 527 - Johnson v. Star

Johnson v. Star’s Empirical Analysis

287 U.S. 527 · 1933

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
January 1988
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1988 · most notably Fidelity Trust Co. v. Union National Bank (1933), United Security Trust Company Case (1936)

26 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

230193319401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boese v. King · Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co. · Tracy v. Tuffly · Cunningham v. Norton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the case at bar the court of civil appeals for the fifth district observed the differences between state insolvency laws and those merely regulating voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors and, following the rule established by the Texas supreme court that non-consenting creditors may not seize property covered by such assignments, held that the fund in the hands of the assignee was not garnishable. And the supreme court, approving that decision and disapproving one to the contrary announced by the court of civil appeals for the sixth district, * * * held that ‘the questions at issue have been definitely settled * * * “Accepting as we do that court’s construction of the provisions in question, we are of the opinion that they are not repugnant to the Bankruptcy Act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.