Wagner v. Leenhouts

Supreme Court of the United States

Jurisdictional statement submitted October 22, 1932.

Decided November 7, 1932.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1932-11-07

1 counsel of record

Relies on McCoy v. Shaw · Binford v. J. H. McLeaish & Co. · United Drug Co. v. Washburn

Decided 1932-11-07

¶1Mr. Fred R. *572Wright for appellant. Messrs. John W. Reynolds, Herbert H. Naujoks, and C. Stanley Perry for appellees.

¶2 *571Per Curiam:

¶3The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the state court here sought to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Arneson v. United Irrigation Co., 284 U. S. 592, 593; Potter v. Maybury, 284 U. S. 593, 594; Ellison Ranching Co. v. Bartlett, 284 U. S. 598.