Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 AD2D 634 - People v. Pugh

People v. Pugh’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[U]pholding denial of postconviction DNA testing in single assailant rape case on grounds that `the absence of defendant's semen on the tested material . . . would not have exonerated or tended to exonerate defendant.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the absence of defendant's semen on the tested material ... would not have exonerated or tended to exonerate defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.