Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 Ark. 629 - McDaniel v. State

McDaniel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably 556 So. 2d 1062 - Vittitoe v. State (1990), Bolt v. State (1993)

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

2001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hill v. United States · United States v. Timmreck · United States v. Smith · Shipman v. State · McFarland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “RULE 24.6. Determining Accuracy of Plea. The court shall not enter a judgment upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere without making such inquiry as will establish that there is a factual basis for the plea.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We have held, and we continue to hold, that compliance with Rule 24 is mandatory. [Citations omitted.] In Shipman v. State, 261 Ark. 559 , 550 S.W.2d 424 (1977), we held that substantial compliance was sufficient. In that case the prosecutor stated the details of the crimes to the court, but our opinion points out: The judge determined, by inquiring of appellant himself, that appellant knew that he was waiving his right to a jury trial, was voluntarily entering a guilty plea to the charges, and was in fact guilty and that he knew that the judge was not bound to accept the terms of the plea bargain. Here there was no substantial compliance, as the court did not inquire of the appellant whether he was in fact guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The court must ask the defendant if he did the things of which he stands accused and is pleading guilty because he is guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.