Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

288 F.2d 154

Docket No. 15640.

Dommel v. Managers, Inc.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Dec. 16, 1960.

Decided Feb. 16, 1961.

Petition for Rehearing Denied March 22, 1961.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-02-16

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1964

3 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1961-02-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*155Mr. Martin E. Gerel, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Lee C. Ashcraft, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.

¶2Mr. William H. Clarke, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Richard W. Galiher and William E. Stewart, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees Managers, Inc. and H. G. Smithy Company.

¶3Mr. Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corporation Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corporation Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corporation Counsel, and Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee, District of Columbia.

¶4Before Wilbur K. Miller, Chief Judge, and Bazelon and Washington, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6When John F. Dommel stepped on a manhole cover in front of an apartment house of which he was a resident and former manager, the cover tilted and he was injured. He sued the owner and rental agent of the apartment house, and also made the District of Columbia a defendant. His wife sued for loss of consortium.

¶7Holding the defendants had neither actual nor constructive notice of the alleged defective condition, the trial court directed a verdict in their favor, whereupon this appeal was taken. We find no error.

¶8Affirmed.

/288/f2d/154 · .json · Public domain