Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 F.2d 310 - Axel C. Wickman and Wickman, Ltd. v. Vinco Corporation and Joseph J. Osplack

Axel C. Wickman and Wickman, Ltd. v. Vinco Corporation and Joseph J. Osplack’s Empirical Analysis

288 F.2d 310 · 1961

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
May 1967
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Gunn v. United States · Kling v. Haring · Midwest Mfg. Co. v. Filter Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall be recognized as giving rise to a right of priority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.