Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 F.2d 362 - Stewart v. Smyth

Stewart v. Smyth’s Empirical Analysis

288 F.2d 362 · 1961

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 1969
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Darr v. Burford · United States ex rel. Jackson v. Brady · Canty v. Alabama · Posey v. Dowd · Bradley v. Smyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “He cannot merely allege that he is illegally detained and, without more, require his custodian to prove the legality of his confinement. It is his burden “to allege and prove primary facts, not inferences, that show, notwithstanding the strong presumption of constitutional regularity in state judicial proceedings, that in his prosecution the state so departed from constitutional requirements as to justify a federal court’s intervention to protect the rights of the accused.” 288 F.2d at 363 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.