Ferguson v. Tabah’s Empirical Analysis
288 F.2d 665 · 1961
Citation profile
44 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably International Controls Corp. v. Vesco (1974), Clarkson Co. v. Shaheen (1976)
44 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Ex parte Fahey · Penn General Casualty Co v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Schnader · Campbell v. United States · Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert Levinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“: 78 indicates that the District Court is vested with wide discretion in the matter of security and it has been held proper for the court to require no bond where there has been no proof of likelihood of harm, or where the injunctive order was issued”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]o ... preliminary injunction shall issue except upon the giving of security by the applicant, in such sum as the court deems proper ....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t has been held proper for the [district] court to require no bond where there has been no proof of likelihood of harm, or where the injunctive order was issued 'to aid and preserve the court's jurisdiction over the subject matter involved.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.