Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 F.2d 683 - Associated Electronic Supply Co. of Omaha v. C. B. S. Electronic Sales Corp.

Associated Electronic Supply Co. of Omaha v. C. B. S. Electronic Sales Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

288 F.2d 683 · 1931

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
April 2010
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2010

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

90193119401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daniel v. Guaranty Trust Co. · In re Sig. H. Rosenblatt & Co. · Smith v. Chase Nat. Bank · Harris v. Capehart-Farnsworth Corp. · Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The power conferred upon courts of bankruptcy by the Bankruptcy Act does not make them courts of general jurisdiction to hear and determine controversies not properly part of a bankruptcy proceeding”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.