Zdanok v. Glidden Co.’s Empirical Analysis
288 F.2d 99 · 1961
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division (1964), Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. (1962)
41 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Federal Trade Commission v. Broch · Parker v. Borock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Of course the employee owning the right [to be recalled at the new location], or his authorized union agent, could bargain away the employee’s right.” Zdanok v. Glidden Co., 288 F.2d 99, 103 , quoted with approval in Oddie v. Ross Gear & Tool Co., 195 F.Supp. 826, 828 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““It appears that the named plaintiff Mary A. Hackett is deceased, and that no motion for substitution has been made. Unless a proper motion is made, the District Court will dismiss the complaint as to that plaintiff.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Proof [on this issue] may well fall short of complete conviction, but the trier of fact will not penalize the plaintiffs on account of the uncertainty which has been caused by the defendant’s conduct.” 14”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.