Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 F.3d 1187 - Johnson v. McKune

Johnson v. McKune’s Empirical Analysis

288 F.3d 1187 · 2002

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gideon v. Wainwright · Coleman v. Thompson · Teague v. Lane · Morissette v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that contrary federal or state precedent exists, while not dispositive, is relevant to our analysis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prove `beyond a reasonable doubt ... every fact necessary to constitute the crime ... charged.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To qualify as a `watershed' rule of criminal procedure, the rule must not only improve the accuracy with which defendants are convicted or acquitted, but also alter our understanding of the bedrock procedural elements essential to the fairness of a proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.