Berry v. Excel Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
288 F.3d 252 · 2002
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 207
Relies on Merritt-Campbell, Inc. v. RxP Products, Inc. · Morris v. Covan World Wide Moving, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The expenses for which reimbursement is made must in order to merit exclusion from the regular rate under this section, be expenses incurred by the employee on the employer's behalf or for his benefit or convenience. If the employer reimburses the employee for expenses normally incurred by the employee for his own benefit, he is, of course, increasing the employee's regular rate thereby.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“From the language of the FLSA itself and the related regulations, we find that the Act requires each employee's expenses to be examined on a case-by-case basis to see whether the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.