Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries Richardson v. US West Communications Inc’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Campbell v. Wood · Upshur County v. Rich · Cantrell v. City of Long Beach · Botosan v. Paul McNally Realty · Commissioners of Road Improvement District No. 2 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The functional test goes beyond the language of the statute, because the functional test is a judicially-developed analysis that neither appears in, nor is necessarily implied by, the statutory language.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is undisputed that [the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries] is not a court. ... [It] is an administrative agency, albeit one that, like many others, conducts court-like adjudications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.