Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 F.3d 978 - Moffat v. Broyles

Moffat v. Broyles’s Empirical Analysis

288 F.3d 978 · 2002

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
July 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Medberry v. Crosby (2003), Evans v. Circuit Court of Cook County (2009)

5 federal appellate ·

400200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Fay v. Noia · Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill · William O'sullivan v. Darren Boerckel · Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]ot a single judge in any other circuit has adopted the view taken in Walker that § 2253(c)(1) is inapplicable to collateral attacks on administrative decisions that affect how much of a judicially imposed sentence shall be served,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Medberry v. Crosby
  2. “Walker reaches a counter-textual conclusion: § 2253(c)(1) asks whether the detention arises out of a state court's process, while Walker asks whether the challenged decision was made by a state court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Medberry v. Crosby

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.