In re Computer Sciences Corp. Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
June 2018
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Califano v. Yamasaki · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for a degree that may not be required under Halliburton "); In re Comp. Sci. Corp. Sec. Litig. , 288 F.R.D. 112 , 120 (E.D. Va. 2012) ("Fourth Circuit precedent does not require that the efficiency of the market be proved using an event study to show a cause and effect relationship between company announcements and changes in the company's stock price.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.