Doucette v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · United States v. Zannino · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tambone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“child[] with certain physical or intellectual disabilities”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doucette v. Jacobs“[a]ny extended absence will be considered truancy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doucette v. Jacobs“increased aggression, paranoia and hallucinations,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doucette v. Jacobs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.