288 Ga. App. 164 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Stephens · Daniel v. State · 263 Ga. App. 625 - McDaniel v. State · 252 Ga. App. 834 - Craft v. State · 192 Ga. App. 710 - Butler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We will not disturb the trial court’s order on a motion to suppress if there is any evidence to support it, and we construe all evidence presented in favor of the trial court’s findings and judgment. McDaniel v. State, 263 Ga. App. 625, 626-627 (1) ( 588 SE2d 812 ) (2003). Where, as here, the evidence was undisputed at the suppression hearing and there is no question as to the credibility of the witnesses, our review of the trial court’s application of the law to the undisputed facts is de novo. Daniel v. State, 277 Ga. 840, 849 (5) ( 597 SE2d 116 ) (2004).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.