Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 Kan. 185 - In Re Swanson

In Re Swanson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Interest of B.D.-Y. · In Re Bd-Y. · In Re Comfort · In Re Rumsey · In Re Bishop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Suspension is generally appropriate when a lawyer knows that false statements or documents are being submitted to the court or that material information is improperly being withheld, and takes no remedial action, and causes injury or potential injury to a party to the legal proceeding, or causes an adverse or potentially adverse effect on tire legal proceeding.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “On the other hand, when exception is taken, this court must examine the record and determine if a rational factfinder could have found the determination to be highly probable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.