State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
310 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 318 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably State v. McCaslin (2011), State v. McCullough (2012)
310 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. Young · Henry v. State of Mississippi · Greer v. Miller · State v. Pabst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 318 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A verdict or finding shall not be set aside, nor shall the judgment or decision based thereon be reversed, by reason of the erroneous admission of evidence unless there appears of record objection to the evidence timely interposed and so stated as to make clear the specific ground of objection.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“dictates that evidentiary errors shall not be reviewed on appeal unless a party has lodged a timely and specific objection to the alleged error at trial.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[A]lthough the presence or absence of an objection may figure into our analysis of the alleged misconduct,'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Thomas · State v. Timley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.