Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 Kan. 643 - State v. Cott

State v. Cott’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2021

10 state decisions

60200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. Kline · State v. Stallings · State v. Williams · State v. Huser · State v. Mourning

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule that a general statute should yield to a specific statute covering the same criminal conduct is a rule of statutory construction designed to determine legislative intent, and it must yield where there is a clear indication that the legislature did not intend for one statute to be the exclusive mechanism for punishing a given activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.